|
This is the time of the year when councils
around the country are busy finalising their
draft annual plans and consulting their
communities over the content. For most
people, this significant period in each
council’s annual cycle passes by with little
interest.
For a few, this is the time to hold councils
accountable for their lavish spending, and it is
a time to scrutinise the figures looking for
reasons to comment.
The figure most trumpeted is the annual rate
increase – and let’s be honest, it always is a
rate increase. The Dominion Post published
a report headlined: Councils favour restraint.
Of the twenty councils mentioned in the report,
the proposed rate increase averaged out at 4.3%,
less than the 4.5% rate of inflation that week.
“At long last, councils are waking up to the
financial realities faced by their ratepayers”,
the Dominion Post editorialised.
Horowhenua District Council came in at 4.26%,
pretty much bang on the average. The talking
points were identified as drainage for sporting
fields, road renewals and $643,948 for Shannon’s
water supply. But I can’t help thinking
that this information hardly reflects what is
happening on our council.
Elected members are popular for two main
reasons. The first category are those who pander
to the low-rate increase faction; those who can
look forward to an election because they have a
reputation for keeping the rates down, which
appeals to the voters. And then there are
those who like to cut ribbons, who want to leave
their legacy as a name inscribed on a plaque.
These elected members also have no reason to
fear the firing squad, because they can smile
broadly and tell the voters: “Look what I’ve
achieved during my time on council”.
But neither approach contributes to good
governance of a city, district or region.
For instance, those who advocate low rates
rarely have to face the expensive catch-up as
subsequent councils have to cope with the
backlog of essential works left on the
back-burner to keep the ratepayers happy.
Waitomo District Council faced this predicament
some years ago, when the council was forced
admit, in their foreword to the 2006 LTCCP that
future rates and debt threatened the
sustainability of Waitomo as a local authority.
Low or no rate increase has the potential to
rebound on future councils.
Equally, current councils need to consider
the long-term repercussions of embarking on a
flurry of major projects that will leave a trail
of debt behind. “Inter-generational equity” has
been the catch-cry of councils who use this
excuse while borrowing to spend up large,
knowing that it will be a subsequent council
that will eventually have to pick up the tab.
And this is the reason councils are obliged to
prepare a long term plan, once known as the
LTCCP, to track the longer term ramifications of
populist decision-making during each three-year
term of council.
So the trick at annual plan time is not to be
fooled by simplistic messages.
The proposed rate increase can be the least
of ratepayer concerns.
In conjunction with the draft annual plan
documents, council also prepare a summary of the
proposed annual plan, which must contain all the
major matters in the larger document. It must be
clear, concise and written in plain English
rather than council jargon so that everybody can
read it.
And this is where you should be able to find
the matters which really count. For instance the
Shannon water treatment plant upgrade hinges on
the availability of Government funding, as the
total cost of the project is $2,967,250 and the
council is relying on Central Government funding
of $2,137,750.
Then there is Te Takere, Levin’s new
community centre which is expected to cost $7
million. The Council plans to contribute $2.4
million towards this project (including $1.8
million already spent), plus fund any shortfall
up to $1.4 million. But this expenditure doesn’t
affect the rates this year, because the council
finances capital expenditure through loans.
Same with the Foxton townscape proposal.
Interestingly, there is space in the summary
document for sketch plans of the design but the
cost of this project doesn’t rate a mention.
Need I go on?
So my advice to ratepayers is simple: if you
don’t want a nasty shock in years to come,
please make an effort to look beyond the
proposed rate increase and dig a little deeper.
It may take a little time but it could save you
money in years to come. |